One World of Warcraft player burned roughly 8.4 million gold by bidding on the MMO’s old $475 mount right before a cheaper $90 version came out

That’s gotta hurt, maybe

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.

World of Warcraft’s new $90 mount – which is, somehow, arguably a bargain – might be a great new addition to the MMO for some, but one player may be kicking themselves after apparently dropping 10 million gold on its pricier sibling right before the sort-of-budget-friendly version became available.

Last week, Blizzard revealed The Trader’s Gilded Brutosaur mount – a big ol' dinosaur-like fella adorned in golden armor, who can become your friend for the low, low price of $90. I know, $90 for an in-game item is a lot, butit’s certainly a lot less than the Reins of the Mighty Caravan Brutosaur mount– a similar, less golden friend who was released in 2018 for five million gold, worth around $475 of real money at the time. After late 2020, he could no longer be purchased, which made the expensive mount evenmorepricey on the Black Market Auction House, leading us to this painful situation right before The Trader’s Gilded Brutosaur mount was revealed.

Asreported by Icy Veins, the tragedy was shared on Reddit by feminineambience, who wrote: “Can we get an F in chat for the person who bid on this on my server today?” The screenshot attached shows someone going all in with 9,999,999 gold on one Reins of the Mighty Caravan Brutosaur four days ago, the same day as The Trader’s Gilded Brutosaur’s reveal. Oh dear. By current gold exchange rates, Icy Veins estimates, this amounts to overpaying roughly 8.4 million gold compared to the price of the re-released mount – assuming you just want the big dino, not the first edition bragging rights.

To be fair, as others in the Reddit thread have pointed out, the new Brutosaur’s arrival in the MMO won’t make the old one any less of a collector’s item, especially formount collectors– it’s just a more affordable alternative for those who want one version of the big guys themselves. So, with that in mind, this player might not regret the decision at all, right? I hope, anyway – they certainly dropped a lot of gold for the privilege.

Desperate to get another RTS off the ground, Blizzard developers reportedly pitched Warcraft 4 and a Call of Duty RTS that got shot down.

Sign up to the GamesRadar+ Newsletter

Weekly digests, tales from the communities you love, and more

I’m one of GamesRadar+’s news writers, who works alongside the rest of the news team to deliver cool gaming stories that we love. After spending more hours than I can count filling The University of Sheffield’s student newspaper with Pokemon and indie game content, and picking up a degree in Journalism Studies, I started my career at GAMINGbible where I worked as a journalist for over a year and a half. I then became TechRadar Gaming’s news writer, where I sourced stories and wrote about all sorts of intriguing topics. In my spare time, you’re sure to find me on my Nintendo Switch or PS5 playing through story-driven RPGs like Xenoblade Chronicles and Persona 5 Royal, nuzlocking old Pokemon games, or going for a Victory Royale in Fortnite.

World of Warcraft devs set about rebuilding “core parts” of the 20-year-old MMO’s infrastructure, accidentally making some of its raid content unplayable

World of Warcraft celebrates its 20th anniversary by selling a $90 version of a mount that cost $475 around 6 years ago, knocking the MMO’s economy sideways

Metaphor ReFantazio’s Count Louis finally gives Atlus a Sephiroth-level villain