EA flop Immortals of Aveum reportedly cost around $125 million, former dev says “a AAA single-player shooter in today’s market was a truly awful idea”

“No one bought it”

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.

A new report sheds some light on just how much EA invested in its single-player FPS Immortals of Aveum, which received mixed reviews and was deemed a financial flop.

Immortals of Aveum launched in August 2023 amidst one of the busiest years of game releases in history, bookended by behemoths likeDiablo 4,Starfield, andBaldur’s Gate 3. Ascendant Studios' self-styled “Call of Duty with magic” experiment was compelling enough, andI personally think it deserved more attention, but it ultimately missed EA’s expectations by enough of a margin thatabout 45% of the studio’s workforce was laid offshortly after release.The studio’s CEO, Bret Robbins, has gone on recordto blame Immortals' poor sales on last year’s extraordinarily busy release calendar, but an anonymous former Ascendant employee speaking toIGNsaid, actually, the concept of the game itself and its sizable budget were both fundamental mistakes and ultimately doomed the project.

“At a high level, Immortals was massively overscoped for a studio’s debut project,” the former employee said. “The development cost was around $85 million, and I think EA kicked in $40 million for marketing and distribution. Sure, there was some serious talent on the development team, but trying to make a AAA single-player shooter in today’s market was a truly awful idea, especially since it was a new IP that was also trying to leverage Unreal Engine 5. What ended up launching was a bloated, repetitive campaign that was far too long.”

Whatever the reason Immortals of Aveum didn’t succeed, it sucks that its failure will only further discourage major studios from investing in the sort of big budget single-player, no-nonsense action games we’re seeing less and less of these days, and redundancies affecting passionate developers suck even worse.

Another anonymous employee, still at Ascendant, told IGN that there was potential in Immortals' old-school approach, but admitted it failed to find an audience regardless. “It’s not a sequel or a remake, it doesn’t take 400 hours to beat, has zero microtransactions, no pointless open world grinding. Although not everyone loved it, it reviewed pretty well, currently sitting at a 74 on OpenCritic and a Mostly Positive on Steam. No one bought it.”

Find out how we ranked thebest FPS gamesof all time.

Sign up to the GamesRadar+ Newsletter

Weekly digests, tales from the communities you love, and more

After scoring a degree in English from ASU, I worked as a copy editor while freelancing for places like SFX Magazine, Screen Rant, Game Revolution, and MMORPG on the side. Now, as GamesRadar’s west coast Staff Writer, I’m responsible for managing the site’s western regional executive branch, AKA my apartment, and writing about whatever horror game I’m too afraid to finish.

A staggering 52% of US Xbox Series X|S players launched Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 the Monday after release, analyst says: “Bonkers engagement”

Halo Infinite update rewinds time for Halo 2’s birthday, throwing the FPS back 20 years with a nostalgic mode that deletes sprint and adds classic maps

“At least one” Game of Thrones movie is reportedly in early development at Warner Bros.